Searched refs:warn_if_reject (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
442 (((state)->warn_if_reject == 0 && (type) != 0) ? \447 (((state)->warn_if_reject == 0 && (type) != 0) ? \452 (((state)->warn_if_reject == 0 && (type) != 0) ? \1092 int warn_if_reject; in smtpd_check_reject() local1099 if (state->warn_if_reject && error_class != MAIL_ERROR_SOFTWARE in smtpd_check_reject()1102 warn_if_reject = 1; in smtpd_check_reject()1105 warn_if_reject = 0; in smtpd_check_reject()1148 if (!warn_if_reject && state->defer_if_reject.active && STR(error_text)[0] == '5') { in smtpd_check_reject()1149 state->warn_if_reject = state->defer_if_reject.active = 0; in smtpd_check_reject()1191 return (warn_if_reject ? 0 : SMTPD_CHECK_REJECT); in smtpd_check_reject()[all …]
138 int warn_if_reject; /* force reject into warning */ member
112 dt b a name warn_if_reject warn_if_reject a b dt
5677 <dt><b><a name="warn_if_reject">warn_if_reject</a></b></dt>5679 <dd> A safety net for testing. When "warn_if_reject" is placed
251 [snapshot-20011121] New "warn_if_reject" smtpd UCE restriction that
5591 Feature: put "warn_if_reject" before an smtpd restriction,7189 The behavior of the warn_if_reject restriction has changed.7196 failing reject restriction after warn_if_reject now merely7199 A failing permit restriction after warn_if_reject still14407 Bugfix (introduced Postfix 2.0): after "warn_if_reject